Unpublished UFO Comments - Part Three - The 2012 Denver Orb And The 2012 Reptilian Crowd

Did you know that the comments gadget on UDCC was immobilized by some outside force (G) and has never been restored? That's why the only way to see the over 1000 comments on UDCC is to go to the individual posts. (Sighs.) And, as you've seen SOL and MUZ were already featured, near commentators of UDCC in the early days.... and today we feature two more SOL classics (now published).... the first about the Shameless Thoughtlesss Sheeple of the Alternative 2012 The Aliens Are Here crowd.
==============================
10-29-2012 -SOL 
Well Rick it looks like some people are caught up in real life dungeons and dragons (reptilians). I find the whole scenario a tiny bit unbelievable, as would many. There's a whole lot waffle but where are the verifiable facts, names places etc. US and for that matter any countries war ships don't disappear with out it being national headlines.
It's all just too much.....
On a different note. I stumbled across some comments while surfing yesterday that stated that HAARP was being used to create Hurricane Sandy. WTF and why? The fringe are getting worse IMO. 

It was the countdown to 12-21-12... and the sheeple were CHARGED up... indeed to what SOL says and as regular readers know... I made a post on DEC 22,  2012 that lost me some readers when I finally slammed the whole crappola 2012 crowd for what they were... WACKOS AND you gotta read the comments there.
==============================================
11-10-2012 - SOL
Truly interesting. I'm not surprised that the object wasn't track able on radar, too small and too fast. It looks like the whole event happens in less time than a radar does one sweep. If the media is serious about resolving this then it would be easy for them to do so. A calibrated high speed camera and a known focal point (distance)could give actual speed calculations along with much clearer shots. Also the leaving and reentry points could have people stationed there for monitoring. It's all just too curious to ignore... 

What SOL was talking about in his comments was the AMAZING TV coverage the Denver TV market gave to a dude who claimed that about the same time every day that Orbs would come from the ground into the sky from about the same location..... and had the video proof seemingly.... ultimately the MSM dismissed it all as FLIES being caught in the camera out of focus I think. I covered it all Here.
=========================================

Real UFO Blogging

Where Do You Get Your UFO Info?

===================================

IT'S Finally Arrived - December 2012 - Countdown Clock Tightens

Good Morning. The possible `tensions' of `expectation' for some part of humanity (who are expecting some end time scenario) - may have provoked a springlike action of phenomena in the Earth's skies in November - an actualized set that has pushed the UDCC `Countdown' Clock to it's latest setting since the `realistic reset' a few months ago. (See bottom of article for new time). We even had mention, supposedly, in the last few days of NASA (really?) saying something about the potential fear of 12-21-12 to easy to influence teenagers and the suicidal. (An official reason as to why the MSM will NOT play up any spectacular sky events even if they do occur?). 

Now, with that introduction aside - I bring you the analysis of November of the `Disclosure Clock' setting:
-------------------------
The Phenomena Itself - 90 (compared to three month average of about 60) The most notable change was in the reporting of UFO's in the shape of Tubes - much like what was seen in October in Kentucky - now known at UDCC as the Virgie `Scroll' UFO. `Scroll' being the form seen by the original uploader of the video VIDEO and pictures to the world. You see, the person had a strong religion/UFO belief and voila - you get scrolls into the sky - possibly inspiring other phenomena of a similar nature that UDCC reported upon at least several times in November. Canada Tub, 2nd October Tube Reported In November, The Virgie Tube Update. - Indeed, November also produced a clear daytime phenomena in New Orleans that was also seen IMO in Ballground Georgia New Orleans Daytime Object - remarkable stuff IMO.

The MS Media - 60 (compared to three month average of 16, and up from a 5 in October). - With the probable cause being the November Ratings sweeps - several very improbable UFO cases made it to the silver TV screen in the month of notarity - most notably - The DENVER UFO footage by the TV station (also replayed by CNN) after the phenomena was brought to their attention by an anonymous old codger. And, a Texas TV station ran a story showing objects in our nighttime skies that are seen with InfraRed cameras. Obviously, the spectra of `confirmation' by the TV station and the `confirmation' that `technology' allows us to see what we can't - provided additional reasons to believe the medias new approach to the unknown perhaps (no longer aliens in crafts or our common skies - those would be Drones - no, we've shifted to semi-material objects that travel 10K MPH and are invisible to the eye and objects simply not visible in our spectrum.).

Governments - 6 (up from 1) - IF the NASA statement is true about 12-21-12, it could be a signal to the MSM to ease up this month. It was also curious to find the US State Department `googling' UFO Disclosure and ending up here. (BTW, the official US position about UFO's can be found in the sidebar - the official position was released in 2011 to the great disappointment of those that believed in UFO Disclosure or that somehow President Obama was any different than his previous compatriots.) We also continue to have a tickle of strange pictures from the Mars surface with the Curiosity craft.

Internet/Other - 55 (three month average about 62) - Finally, the `UFO Wars' crappola/disinformation is lessening IMO. The endtimer 2012 sites that are still operating are few and far between (have they already ascended? LOL.) and are probably worried that the big day will be a disappointment - especially if they are depending on the MSM for a boost in these final weeks.  Additionally and perhaps a bit surprisingly, our politicians with the `fiscal cliff' have built in a new `end time' in conjunction with the years date and ending - so, was it 12-31-12 after all?
--------------
Overall analysis - The Tube/Scroll - phenomena is strange to say the least. These are seemingly beyond temporal phenomena and almost suggest even a possible hologram perception IMO. It could even be Fortean. And, it certainly could be HOAXES too. The `MSM expansion' of UFO's to now include the `unseen' - but `with technology proof' - is very interesting also but also removes the MSM from challenging the `Government Position' on UFO's - IMO. 

Finally, perhaps a few of you would like to know how I shake out on the 12-21-12 saga............. the 22nd will occur.
=================
So, what does all the above, all related to November,  do to the new more highly variable  UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock in December 2012? It moves the emotionally charged December 2012 UFO Clock to 10:00 PM, with possible updates during the month.
=====================================
=====================================
Some of my Kindle Books Are Below:

          1.69                          2.99                            1.99
===========================================================
Below are some of the books found in the UDCC Book Vault:
Book Vault Secret Address - Click To Enter.

Denver UFO Catfight - Citizens Say `It's Bugs', TV Station Says `Tis not'

Good morning Clockers - got a firm grip on your hot cocoa or coffee today? Get ready to take some long sips while you consider my packaged update of the November Denver UFO (kinda has a ring to it, don't you think?). And, as we left you last......... the citizens were planning their own stake out of the TV video location to see for themselves whether the Denver UFO had legs (or wings) to stand upon.

For those late to the Denver UFO party scene - a Denver TV station earlier this month ran a Story on November 8th about an UFO that was brought to their attention by a man who was not identified in the report. The man claimed that for several months he had been going to a particular location in Denver between noon and 1 PM and simply setting up his camera and running the video tape. Within the captures of the tape, the man claimed that on many days a week that from a particular intersection in Denver an UFO would come out of the ground and fly around Denver's skies - so fast - that it could only be seen if you slowed down the tape. WAY slooooowwwww dowwwnnnnn. And that then, you could also see the UFO go back into the ground near the same location that it emerged from prior to it's air flight.

Yeah, quite a claim.

So, the TV station sends it's own crew to the same spot at the time the man suggested and guess what - yeah, you guessed it - UFO seen doing exactly as the man suggested. TV station brings on multiple experts to assure us all that this is not normal crafts and isn't birds or a bug. Then, simply declares the video finding a UFO. (Picking great photo stills from the video that even look like the classic saucer UFO.)
--------------------
Enough for the background - on to the real controversy - the counter report by `citizens' - ............ indeed, at least TWO groups of `citizens'. You see, not only did the citizen sleuth show up - the `professional' citizen sleuth - in the form of a professional `paranormal' research society investigative team showed up. Everyone armed with their video cameras and preconceived ideas and possible agendas. 

Indeed, on the face of it - as an outside observer - it appeared to UDCC that each group was simply determined to show how inadequate of a job the MSM TV station had done; suspecting them to be doing it simply for ratings during the ratings sweeps. And, with that - let's turn to the counter view of the `follow up' proving event.

So, on the following Saturday and even other times - folks from the social/news site Reddit show up at the location with cameras running. Here is the thread on Reddit talking about the findings - Reddit Denver UFO Comments - if you read this link - you will find some of the following among the 167 comments. 

1. As opposed to what the TV station said - the place had tons of bugs that could have entered the video panorama. (the original reporter had made some quip about the station not turning bugs into a UFO story). Oh, pictures of the bugs was offered as proof. Denver BUG UFO `Moneyshot'. As was this video of the area of the shooting - where you can hear the citizen sleuths meet up with other citizen sleuths. Video Of Field - With UFO Videographers Talking in background - seen by all of 267 folks and offering no proof of anything - the only comment says - `I was promised flies'.
2. One of the other groups was the paranormal investigators - Rocky Mountain Paranormal. Who was going to issue their own report - Paranormal Denver Report on Denver UFO. (We'll get to this in a moment.)
3. That some folks see a `thruster' in the original video when the craft turns - which others call a reflection - and that their was confusion that CNN sent a crew to cover this when it was CNN who simply ran the original Denver TV UFO report. Yes, stuff as basic as this can be misunderstood. It's also of interest that CNN ran the story about the FOX TV station that did the story first - was that to make Fox look stupid?
4. This comment about sums up the general Reddit view:

dontblamethehorse 14 points 7 days ago*

There was good evidence in the original video that it was flies. Then you have a bunch of people go out there and film, reporting that there are tons of flies in the area. Then you get a guy who catches those flies on camera, showing them flying across the frame... Similar to the original video, where an insect flies right near the lens. Then an insect actually lands on the lens.

What is more plausible?

There is some type of craft that has been taking off and landing from a residential area on a daily/weekly basis at the same time for months, but only one man filming from a field has seen it. Despite confirming it wasn't bugs or birds or anything else identifiable, the investigative reporter didn't see fit to look into further by changing locations, trying to get closer, or visiting the place it appeared to be taking off from to find out what it was. Instead, they drop it and say they will follow up in the future when they have time. UFOs can wait.

A bunch of people go out to debunk it, and in fact find the field in question has flies everywhere. They setup cameras, and see flies while viewing the footage. One even lands directly on someone's camera, and look nearly identical to the original video. Nothing else weird is spotted. This is all a coincidence though, because the craft does in fact exist. It just didn't come out today.

Or...

It was a guy filming flies. The reason they didn't attempt to find the landing site or do any follow up investigation - something you'd imagine they'd be quite eager to do - is because they knew it was flies, and that there was no actual story.

The people who went out to debunk the story saw flies that looked almost identical to the original video because the original video was in fact flies.

5. More YouTube video from on-site - Citizen Sleuth Denver UFO Video - he didn't see anything but perhaps you will. Oh, the entire gig was `watched over' by a local cop the entire time.

6. Now, Reddit did offer up compelling folks saying the general consensus was full of crap:

[–]YouMirinBrah 0 points 7 days ago*

You're ignorant of the facts and it is impacting your ability to make an accurate assessment.

The man said the "object" appears two or three days out of a week. You go out for ONE day, and somehow, you're able to conclusively say without any doubt in your mind that it was "unlikely" anything but a fly in the original film.

If you're done playing scientist you might want to read up on what it takes to scientifically come to a conclusion that has at least a moderate degree of certainty and then come back to us.

For the record I think it could very easily be misidentification.

EDIT 1 - Also, I hope that smoking gun "money shot" is some kind of joke. That in NO WAY at ANY point looks like the "object" in the two original videos. You're have to be seriously deluded to think that it in any way says anything other than an insect landed on his camera lens.

==================

The thread died this death 5 days ago - despite the TV station responding itself to the claim that it was bugs as you can see in the video below:

Oh, this was the conclusion of the Paranormal group - in addition to lots of bugs gathered:

After close examination of the videos of the reported “UFO’s” from the FOX News broadcast it appears that the objects in question are a combination of native insects and birds. 

We guided to this conclusion by using the principle or Occams Razor which states that given multiple answers (all things being equal) the simpler explanation is usually the correct one. The explanation being a native bird/insect or an Extraterrestrial visitor in their spaceship that was not noticed by anyone but a person who was trying to find a UFO seems to have an obvious answer. 

====================================

And, believe it or not - the Paranormal Group made such a fuss about the TV station not using a bug expert in their original TV newscast that - you guessed it - the TV station brought in a (very lame) bug expert who declared the object in the original video to NOT BE BUGS; - but it might be a `military drone, a remote controlled toy or even bugs' - as they repeated what they had heard from the public and then tried to disprove. It's a bit hard to get thru the laughter at the end of the follow up report.
=====================
And, finally, perhaps the most interesting aspect of the whole story - if true - was tackled by - again, a citizen sleuth who tried to figure out in print for everyone just `how fast' something would have to be going to be `faster than sight' as an Unidentified Flying Object. I provide his analysis - he is called Cubbybearblu in his comment name at this link - he uses all kinds of ways in his considerations including how our brains work when it comes to perceptions - are you ready for how fast he says this object may be going? 10,000 MPH to 75,000 MPH.
===============================
===============================
Yet, despite all this above analysis - I didn't hear or read even ONE person - other than myself at UDCC - bridge the gap about this object being less than a `material object' in our ordinary way of thinking about phenomena. That is IF this is an anomalous phenomena.

Which, if you followed all the data above to it's logical conclusion - hasn't been proven in any manner. It also hasn't been proven to be bugs - as we avoid the elephant in the room - what comes out of the ground at 10K+ MPH that isn't fully a material object?

A subject much too far down the slippery slope for any real discussion. Next thing you know, some TV producer will want to call it a Fairy. 
======================================
======================================
You can share this on Facebook via the share button below if you wish.
======================================
MY KINDLE AUTHOR PAGE
THE UDCC BOOK VAULT


There’s no single, simple answer, of course. The “invisibility speed” would depend on the ambient light level, the relative size of the object in one’s visual field, the relative direction of motion, the presence of other sensory cues such as whooshes or flashes, the direction of your visual attention, and a host of other factors. You can’t see a speeding rifle bullet, for example, but you can see a much larger military jet moving at the same speed. This treatment here, in the bulletin of a medical research institute, gives a good overview of the problem. 

It isn’t hard to come up with a seat-of-the-pants estimate, though. The binocular field of view of a person with normal vision is about 120 degrees. Let’s imagine an airplane-sized object that speeds straight across this binocular field of view, with a closest approach of one mile. How quickly must it get across to be effectively invisible? 
There’s no single, simple answer, of course. The “invisibility speed” would depend on the ambient light level, the relative size of the object in one’s visual field, the relative direction of motion, the presence of other sensory cues such as whooshes or flashes, the direction of your visual attention, and a host of other factors. You can’t see a speeding rifle bullet, for example, but you can see a much larger military jet moving at the same speed. This treatment here, in the bulletin of a medical research institute, gives a good overview of the problem. 

It isn’t hard to come up with a seat-of-the-pants estimate, though. The binocular field of view of a person with normal vision is about 120 degrees. Let’s imagine an airplane-sized object that speeds straight across this binocular field of view, with a closest approach of one mile. How quickly must it get across to be effectively invisible? 

The human visual system starts to lose its ability to distinguish stimuli — even under optimal conditions — when they are separated by less than about 1/50th of a second. That isn’t strictly relevant to this problem; the question here is whether you can detect a single novel stimulus moving against an ordinary background. But the 1/50 sec figure gives us a rough idea of the effective “refresh rate” of the human visual system, and I think we can all agree that just about anything crossing our visual field in 1/50 sec. would be invisible, unless it is highly luminous against a dark background. In bright daylight even a much slower object — even at airplane scale, at an easy, one-mile viewing distance — could still be unnoticeable to most or all viewers if it is not luminous. Human eyes frequently dart around (saccade) for about 1/5 sec at a time, during which the visual feed is interrupted; also our eyes blink a lot, for intervals that can be even longer. These interruptions are effectively random, so they wouldn’t blind everyone at once. Also, like other mammals we have a visual system that is highly sensitive to moving objects, even if we can’t perceive them with sharp resolution. But surely the effective FOV-crossing limit is higher than 1/50 sec. 

What’s the upper limit on this transit time? I think that if I were staring out onto a clear, sunlit expanse of ground or water, an airplane-sized object speeding across my binocular visual field a mile away would have to cross in well under a second, to go unnoticed. Let’s say 1/2 second. (Count ‘one-mississippi’ but stop halfway — it’s a longer interval than it might seem.) I’m pretty sure that an object of that size, moving that fast, at that distance, would still be perceptible to a significant fraction of onlookers. I’d bet that even a 1/4 sec transit would be noticed by some people, especially if they’re expecting to see something. But let’s stick with 1/2 sec to be (I think) conservative. What speed does that represent? 

If you work out the simple trigonometry of it, you come up with a figure just shy of 25,000 mph — which is faster than low-earth-orbit satellites move. It’s also faster than a simple, earth-technology aircraft could move through the lower atmosphere without quickly burning up. And again, I believe that’s conservative. The real speed for effective invisibility of a large object before a multitude of onlookers could be double or triple that figure. 

At closer ranges, the same object would be larger and in that sense more perceptible, but also would spend less time crossing people’s fields of view, so it could well have a lower invisibility-speed. Clearly invisibility-speed is neither static nor simply linearly varying with distance. But even if you were to halve the distance and assume a halved invisibility-speed, you’d be talking about something that has to move at more than 10,000 mph. 

These calculations are relevant and It s no toy!
The human visual system starts to lose its ability to distinguish stimuli — even under optimal conditions — when they are separated by less than about 1/50th of a second. That isn’t strictly relevant to this problem; the question here is whether you can detect a single novel stimulus moving against an ordinary background. But the 1/50 sec figure gives us a rough idea of the effective “refresh rate” of the human visual system, and I think we can all agree that just about anything crossing our visual field in 1/50 sec. would be invisible, unless it is highly luminous against a dark background. In bright daylight even a much slower object — even at airplane scale, at an easy, one-mile viewing distance — could still be unnoticeable to most or all viewers if it is not luminous. Human eyes frequently dart around (saccade) for about 1/5 sec at a time, during which the visual feed is interrupted; also our eyes blink a lot, for intervals that can be even longer. These interruptions are effectively random, so they wouldn’t blind everyone at once. Also, like other mammals we have a visual system that is highly sensitive to moving objects, even if we can’t perceive them with sharp resolution. But surely the effective FOV-crossing limit is higher than 1/50 sec. 

What’s the upper limit on this transit time? I think that if I were staring out onto a clear, sunlit expanse of ground or water, an airplane-sized object speeding across my binocular visual field a mile away would have to cross in well under a second, to go unnoticed. Let’s say 1/2 second. (Count ‘one-mississippi’ but stop halfway — it’s a longer interval than it might seem.) I’m pretty sure that an object of that size, moving that fast, at that distance, would still be perceptible to a significant fraction of onlookers. I’d bet that even a 1/4 sec transit would be noticed by some people, especially if they’re expecting to see something. But let’s stick with 1/2 sec to be (I think) conservative. What speed does that represent? 

If you work out the simple trigonometry of it, you come up with a figure just shy of 25,000 mph — which is faster than low-earth-orbit satellites move. It’s also faster than a simple, earth-technology aircraft could move through the lower atmosphere without quickly burning up. And again, I believe that’s conservative. The real speed for effective invisibility of a large object before a multitude of onlookers could be double or triple that figure. 

At closer ranges, the same object would be larger and in that sense more perceptible, but also would spend less time crossing people’s fields of view, so it could well have a lower invisibility-speed. Clearly invisibility-speed is neither static nor simply linearly varying with distance. But even if you were to halve the distance and assume a halved invisibility-speed, you’d be talking about something that has to move at more than 10,000 mph. 

These calculations are relevant and It s no toy!

Happy Thanksgiving From UDCC

Gobble Gobble (just realized how much that looks like Google) Clockers - glad you still came by on America's favorite holiday today. And, as a reward for doing so, I have not one, not two, but THREE FREE books on my Author Page today. And, not only that - the three free books are 3 of the top UFO 4 books this month - my hottest books.

Oh, I know not everyone has a Kindle - but, you are on a PC and I can tell you now - you can download the KINDLE reading app to your PC for FREE. You can get started in this E-Book thing today - for FREE. Should I say that again? FREE - KINDLE reading app.  (Simply go to Amazon and download)
-------------------
I want to thank the person/persons who purchased BIG TIME off my blogs yesterday - 12 items - including tools and such. But, also, two books were purchased - check them out below:


===============================================================
Don't worry Clockers - I'm still following closely the developments in Denver about the `faster than sight UFO' -  and will bring you a very full update worthy of your read soon...... You may also want to read the latest in the UDCC comments as we have another person under the influence of who knows what that has checked in with his own 30 minute video of proof of something. Tread at your own risk.
===========================================
Remember - THREE FREE BOOKS Today - go check them out. Thanks........... And, back to the Ludicrous Foes tomorrow.

Texas TV Report - The Crafts Cruise At 1000 Feet At 80 MPH!

This MSM report of UFO's courtesy of Larado Texas, NewsWest TV 9 covering UFO's that are only seen by military night vision apparatus. Once again, like in Denver, the anomalous sky phenomena pointed out by a codger who wanted to remain anonymous. And, once again, we have the classic description of `Triangles with Spheres at each of its vortex's'. (IMO possibly creating the perception itself - something yet to sink into most thinking about this phenomena.)
Here's the web link to the written story - Larado Nightvison UFO (Oh, Billy Cox carried this story as part of his dissing the TV markets for carrying UFO stories only during sweeps - and on this one - I somewhat agree that the folks making these types of claims - of night-vision UFO's - have been around for a bit of time (Joe Capp is big on this as one) and that this is in the category of `hey how about that UFO story' we didn't cover before. Especially the guy who mentions December 21st.)
KWES NewsWest 9 / Midland, Odessa, Big Spring, TX: newswest9.com |
======================================================== (if the video embed link doesn't work use the direct links)

KWES NewsWest 9 / Midland, Odessa, Big Spring, TX: newswest9.com |

=======================================================
Oh, BTW, CNN has now covered the Daytime Denver UFO Phenomena and here you can read over 200 comments as it seems that a number of Redditor's  in Denver are going to link up this weekend and try to prove something about the phenomena using multiple cameras from multiple Angles - as I said on day one - this is an important UFO story. And, yes, the typical naysayers are out in full force as are the conspiracy folks.
==================================
Here's a story about the national UFO Alert - an interesting read. I may try to come up with a more real indexing in the near future for Clockers using this same data.
==================================
==================================
My thanks to those that bought a number of my books off my Kindle Author Page yesterday. Over 300 FREE downloads already given away this month BTW.
==================================
Finally, some products of interest for those interested in the night vision camera thing:
Spy Net Recording Goggles - Night Vision
======================================================
Four of you yesterday found the UDCC Book Vault - like finding an old dusty corner of an oldtime bookstore.
==================================
CLICK THE COVER TO READ A SAMPLE - THANKS.
MY HEAVIEST BOOK - AWARD WINNER ON FREEBOOKSY.COM (2012)

Dealing With The `Faster Than Sight' (Denver/Earth) UFO Phenomena

The folks of the UFOlogy `community' are buzzing about the recent TV coverage of the UFO Phenomena in Denver Colorado - by their OWN TV crew. I covered the story on Saturday Links To Denver UFO Video Coverage and commented on it yesterday. Indeed, MUZ has noticed the story elsewhere already.

However, some evidently are NOT impressed with the TV coverage - expecting a three camera shot to prove something beyond what is already out there. I'd say that Billy Cox has higher expectations than myself about the MSM. He's even attributing the coverage to only occurring because of the TV ratings season. Cynical to the max. Once again, let me repeat my view,  I'm VERY impressed with how the station handled this incredible story-line with tons of implications - even esoterically potentially.

Now, I'm sure that the anonymous person in Denver - and probably a growing legion of followers there at the minimum - are NOT going to go away with just this one showing. Their `PROOF' of something anomalous is going to GROW IMO. There is NO reason to think that this phenomena is going to turn off IMO. It is going to have to be `explained' by armchair experts in all kinds of niches of the paranormal. I myself am grappling with how to think this phenomena data into some sort of idea structure that I'm comfortable at trying to relate to readers of UDCC and my blog The Heavy Stuff.

At about the 72 hours point of being into this reporting about the phenomena - for me the thing of greatest interest is the ubiquitousness of this phenomena elsewhere. IF this can be confirmed elsewhere, this could heat up REAL quick. REAL QUICK. ---------------------- Next of interest to me is `are these objects in some intended interaction with the observers'? (Does are `reliable' time indicate such?) ---------------------------- What kind of `probe' are we talking about here? Who or what is behind an object that is seemingly not entirely material? Is the object `DOING something' - data gathering or whatever; is also of interest to me? ------------ Is this phenomena something new or would older videos of/from the same location show the same phenomena in the past? And, will the media drop the ball at this point OR be warned off by the powers that be that this whole `story' is simply `too hot' - and `too unknown'. (Is the rumor true of black helicopters trolling also true? Does this bolster in any manner the idea of underground facilities? Is this any different than the capture of a ghost on security video?)

IF folks were looking for some `escalation' in the days leading up to 12-21-12 --- this might do for some. Especially if the story develops legs and crawls out of the sea as an evolutionary idea for how to view the anomalous around us on Earth. Things that are `faster than sight' and that have seemingly no mass after displaying a perception that is seemingly recordable on video.

Things that were once - a week ago - in the category of fantasy. Things which now invoke the rekindled spirit of  Fortean Wonder about `what's next'? Things, that may be starting to offer their own proof - intended or not.
====================================
====================================
As you may have noticed - I've put a feedburner gadget onto the sidebar for those into the subscribing side of the internet as a way to get your content. The data would suggest that about 1/5 of you click thru daily - much appreciated. Take a look around and dig into the sidebar. 11 `signed up' yesterday - I'll keep it up there for a few more days - as Clockers know, UDCC updates often enough that you should simply stop by everyday or two at most.
===================================
Much appreciated are the sales off my Author Page - Today (Tuesday)It Again Has A FREE BOOK - at least for a few more hours and it's this one Take A Look. (Ssssshhhh..... I seldom make it this easy.)
==================================
Please share this post to Facebook with the share buttons below - then your friends can download the free book.

Denver TV Report - `The Objects Appear About Noon To 1:00 PM' -

This may be a very important UFO story.

As Clockers know, I love to bring MSM presentations of the UFO phenomena to UDCC readers. Today, with a hat-tip to The Debris Field's Ongoing Excellent Work, - I bring a Denver TV report that really fits the 2012 UFO motif that I've been reporting upon. Namely, the idea that some UFO's are `behaving' in manners that suggest possible interactions with human intentionalities - OR - a stepped up desire by the UFO's to be seen and known - by simply being `consistent'. Systematic.

As again Clockers know, I've been outlining a continuing saga of individuals, usually men but not always, who absolutely routinely `videotape the anomalous'. Nearly always these `anomalous phenomena' can easily be put into the luminous Orb category that represent the real majority of UFO's in our Earth's region - IMO. And, once again, that is apparently the case in Denver - as some codger is simply watching a particular region of the daily sky over Denver at/during a systematic timeframe - in this case from Noon to One in the afternoon. Yes folks, more daytime Structured  Craftlike `Orbs' (in the broadest sense) - perhaps stepping up their game? 

For some reason the video doesn't embed easily and is on the bottom of this post instead of here as I intended - so I have to bring to you only the link - this is a MUST SEE - Denver TV UFO Report. ------------------ Can you believe that the guy LITERALLY states the `intersection' in Denver that the craft emerge and return to? OMG. IS THIS COMING FROM THE GROUND? THE EARTH?

And, frankly, this report gives REAL credence to what I have been largely pooh-poohing around here somewhat - that being the folks, who use the `slowing down the tape' method to capture what they call too fast to see UFO's in their immediate vicinity. (Indeed, like the San Antonio Feather Orb woman Pam Garcia and others.) Perhaps I need to open my mind just a bit further. Perhaps this is indeed a `gradient' of phenomena, with Luminous Orbs being only a part.

Indeed, it is my contention that the MSM doesn't cover Orbs because they can't explain them; - indeed, this kind of material is so over the top in UN explain-ability that I'm flabbergasted that they (TV mainstream media) even offered it to the public. I mean, what IF dozens and dozens of codgers join this dude on the hill for a daily video party of the Unknown? What IF that started to happen? Would the slippery slope be nearing? Would the phenomena continue to allow itself to be observed and filmed?

Below, you can see the TWO awesome videos of the object - including the one shot by the Denver TV station. This is a must see UFO story Clockers.

======================================
======================================
An astounding 153 of you downloaded the FREE book off my Author Page Yesterday and at least two of you purchased books  of mine too. Thanks.
======================================
PLEASE CHECK OUT OUR AFFILIATE BELOW

sometimes a gift for the HOUSE is the most appropriate for your family
==============================================================
PLEASE SHARE TODAY'S POST VIA FACEBOOK WITH THE BUTTON BELOW