Good Morning Clockers. And, welcome to all newbies on today, August 21st, 2011 - the latest hoaxed date of supposed UFO Disclosure today by President Obama. (To be done in an offhand manner while discussing other things.) Yeah Right.
But, as fate would have it - and interestingly, I ran across some REAL HEAVY INFO about UFOs just yesterday (all in a book written by a Physicist) that I wanted to share with all UDCC readers. And, it's not just casual info - we are talking about a man who looked over the data of over 200,000 UFO reports.
He then compared the reported effects on humans and electronic components - to literally - FIGURE OUT HOW UFO CRAFT `WORK'. Really....................... Indeed, his theories would account for many reported effects and are consistent with the distances that the effects were reported from (proximity to the UFO Craft).
The link I found this info at yesterday first Here - led the post with:
Explained are the famous EM effects of car engines and headlights dying and some temporary paralysis near UFOs, and why UFOs do not create sonic booms at supersonic speed. Also how UFOs neutralize inertia and do tremendous accelerations without a sound, how they float in gravity, how they propel themselves and why they do zig-zag motions instead of smooth turns, why they sometimes exhibit “falling leaf” motion, and why they occasionally levitate objects and even cars.
=========
This is the actual `chapter' of his book that explains the Physics of the UFO, from his website Here that lays out the chapters of his book.
=========================================
Now, I know that the physics is over the head of nearly all of us. That said, the concepts are reachable as are many of his conclusions based on the `evidence'. His book (btw, the author is John Mike and he has his e-mail and phone number at the first link) has only been out about TWO months.
Is this an example of a real answer being lost in the proverbial shuffle? Has UDCC actually brought UFO Disclosure on August 21st as promised?
Yeah, right.
=============================
(This is how John describes his book at Amazon)
This book explains how UFOs work. It solves essential mysteries of UFO behavior that have been well-documented and unsolved for over fifty years. How is this possible? Very simple. The Center of UFO Studies (CUFOS) has for 30 years been accumulating a searchable database of UFO eyewitness reports. To date they number 209,000. To my knowledge no one has taken a serious look at these reports. I now have. All the conclusions in the book come directly from interpreting the eye witness reports. The basic conclusions were an inevitable consequence of applying standard physics principles to the reports. The fundamental revelation, that UFOs possess gravitationally negative mass, is an inescapable consequence of the fact that UFOs sometimes "levitate" people and cars. Gravitationally negative mass, when spun at high speed, allows UFOs to negate inertia. This fact suddenly throws the whole field of UFO behavior open. Now essentially all the activities of UFO can be understood. They can not only be qualitatively understood, but they can be calculated and predicted in detail. We do the calculations in the book and provide diagrams. We not only explain how UFOs kill inertia, but how they float in gravity, why they do zig-zag motions instead of smooth turns, why the sometimes exhibit "falling leaf" motion, how they propel themselves, and why they sometimes levitate objects. We explain the famous EM effects of car engines and headlights dying near UFOs, and why they do not create sonic booms at supersonic speed.
=========================================
(click book icon below for more info)
========================================
My Questions For John Mike (update, within two hours, John Mike has provided the answers in red below via my comment section)
--------------------------
What would conditions be like inside the UFO craft for occupants? 2.) If 30 feet in diameter is the lower limit of UFO size, could `ORBs' of smaller size have the same physics? 1. Conditions inside the UFO would
be perfectly normal. They are insulated from the environment as they travel in space and have been seen underwater. The occupants would not feel any accelerations or movement since there is no inertia inside a UFO.
2. The 30 foot size limit was for saucer shaped UFOs. Other shapes may not employ negative mass the same way so they may not have the same physics.
3. If a 30 foot UFO passed over a metropolitian area at a height of 200 feet, going 40 mph, would the population underneath notice the effects? (Variations of such too.) It would depend on the type of UFO. The Big Black Triangle type UFOs passed over cities and roads =================================
at about 200 or more feet in the Hudson Valley and Belgian waves with no apparent effects on the ground. In the Hudson wave there were only 2 EM effects mentioned out of 7,000 reports, and only as the UFO passed the top of a bridge
tower did the lights at the top of the bridge go out. The pronounced effects felt usually have come from
saucer type UFOs. Apparently the shape of the inertia free regions they create is spherical and extends further out. Just last week a former commander of a missile silo revealed that the missiles malfunctioned as UFOs passed overhead.
I will be informing John Mike of this post (thanks John) and hope he will answer the above. IF YOU have questions, please enter them in the comment section today.
===========================
Thanks for being a Clocker
Join the Leaders Via The Sidebar
===========================
A big thanks to the individual that bought these two books from my blogs yesterday
======================================
====================================
====================================
My stats show more and more readers of UDCC responding by finding out more about Solar Energy information available on this page. Such as how much solar can save you. Such as how solar homes sell faster. Such as, the government is subsidizing this stuff at a huge percentage of the total cost. Such as how the ROI has went from 20 years to ....... (find out more) http://www.astrumsolar.com/costsavings/overview
=========================
Grape Solar GS-440-KIT Residential 440 Watt Grid-Tied Solar Power System Kit
Some answers to your questions:
ReplyDelete1. Conditions inside the UFO would
be perfectly normal. They are insulated from the environment as they travel in space and have been seen underwater. The occupants would not feel any accelerations or movement since there is no inertia inside a UFO.
2. The 30 foot size limit was for saucer shaped UFOs. Other shapes may not employ negative mass the same way so they may not have the same physics.
3. It would depend on the type of UFO. The Big Black Triangle type UFOs passed over cities and roads
at about 200 or more feet in the Hudson Valley and Belgian waves with no apparent effects on the ground. In the Hudson wave there were only 2 EM effects mentioned out of 7,000 reports, and only as the UFO passed the top of a bridge
tower did the lights at the top of the bridge go out. The pronounced effects felt usually have come from
saucer type UFOs. Apparently the shape of the inertia free regions they create is spherical and extends further out. Just last week a former commander of a missile silo revealed that the missiles malfunctioned as UFOs passed overhead.
John Mike
John,
ReplyDeleteFirst, thanks so much for answering my questions. Perhaps you will consider being a regular around UDCC and offering some insights into some of my speculations on occasion. (Mainly about ORBS.)
Now, about your answers.
1. Would `occupants' experience any effects with a craft that could accellerate to near light speed? Would that be even possible?
2. Interesting. So, would `smaller balls of light' such as ORBS have this as a mechinism, or can you think of other physics?
3. I find your theory about UFOs interesting but wonder why the effects (levatating and such) are so extremely limited. I can tell you that the reports of such are EXTREMELY limited. Does that make you think differently at all?
Also, just a caution around here -- UDCC believes almost NOTHING that comes from the MSM, including the possible, disinfo about nukes. Not saying it isn't true, just saying you may find `belief' in what anyone says suspect to base `beliefs' upon.
Welcome aboard John, hope I can spread your information further down the line and into the public.
RP
1. The highest actual recorded UFO speed is by Belgian radar at 1010 miles per hour. UFOs can probably go somewhat faster but we do not know how fast. The mechanism for acceleration that I think they have does not provide for going near the speed of light. I have no knowledge of might happen in that regimen.
ReplyDelete2. All UFOs seem to float in gravity which means they probably have equal amount of positive and negative mass. The saucer shape is to have the negative mass in form of a ring, so when it is spun it creates a maximal negative vector potential to negate inertia. If one is not interested in negating inertia, then the mass does not have to be spun. So Orbs or other shape would still exhibit UFO properties such as floating but might not be able to do great accelerations.
3. No it is not surprising that some of the reported side effects are rare. For levitation to work the Flying Saucer has to be very near the object levitated and also be moving. It has to be near so that the anti-gravity field is strong enough. The field falls of as the square of the distance. And to produce levitation, a gravity field is the time rate of change of the vector potential, so the Saucer has also to be moving at the same time. So the Saucer has to be making a very low pass over the people and objects to be levitated, which may be a rare event.
John Mike
wow, you have a lot of sites Rick!
ReplyDeletea question: I am putting together a book project called Manifestations and Materializations and wondered if you would be interested in contributing? Bruce Duensing has a short piece. If you want to contact me about it, can do so at zeug@pd.org , the org's website is http://www.pd.org . I can send you the orienting call for papers if you wish.
Rob C.
John,
ReplyDeleteAgain, thanks for your quick responses to my inquiries.
To continue our conversation:
1. I'm with you that the physics you describe you do not know the power of it to accellerate to anywhere lightspeed. What I'd like you to speculate is IF such as saucer craft could do something along those lines (after all, some reports have them almost vanishing in an infinite regress) - would the space inside the craft still be inertia free?
Also, that upper speed is interesting. Are you sure that the few `fast walkers' that supposedly come in from space aren't well in excess of that speed. Also, I believe that the craft near Stephenville texas was measured about 700-800 mph.
2. Very interesting. You will find at UDCC that I make every effort to know that IMO, `UFO' have mulitiple answers. ORBs are not crafts (99% of the time at least) and yet are the most seen anomaly. What is of interest to me about ORBs is the recent science that shows that LIGHT can come literally from nothing but the virtual reality flux. - Your comment about accelleration of ORBs is well taken however as almost never do you see an accelleration of significance with ORBs (Jerusalem Orb notwithstanding).
3. Thanks, you make some very good points - it might be indeed extremely rare.
Finally, I hope you'll dig into my blog here for the point of views and attitudes I put towards the UFO phenomena. Of which `real crafts with aliens in them' are of the utmost rarity.
thanks man.
RP
1. In the ARTICLE on my website I derive a fundamental equation for a flying saucer. By that equation a UFO can only be inertia free at a limited speed, in the neighborhood of 1,000 mph. The Texas speeds you mention were less then that. The UFO appearing to disappear faster than that may have another explanation.
ReplyDeleteUFOs appear to "shrink". I have a chapter in my book that "shrinking"
is actually disappearing into another dimension. So the apparent fast disappearance may just be their way of vanishing. I also mention there that UFOs probably do not come from outer space, they
just simply appear. If they came from outer space, they would have to come through near space and trigger nuclear war false alarms. Since there are probably thirty UFO
appearances a day, it would drive the military crazy.
2. I just did not get around to considering Orb in my book, just flying saucers.
Rob,
ReplyDeleteReally enjoyed talking with you yesterday. It will/would be very cool to see it all come together.
John,
Again, thanks for your answers.
1.First, thanks for saying I dont know. But, are you saying that the inertia free zone would shrink or vanish?
2. Not really sure where you get the 30 a day figure (or is that the average of the 200k reports? which I would NOT consider a real figure) - or, if it would apply to UFO crafts or ORB reports.
I also doubt that UFOs are flying from elsewhere very often and `arriving' here from outer space - that said, I find the idea of them appearing from another dimension just as strange as they would be coming from elsewhen.
Rick
1. The limitation on blocking inertia comes from the following fact. The re-active force of inertia in the universe is generated by anything moving in the universal background scalar potential PHI. There is no limit to this. The greater the speed, the greater the positive vector potential that creates inertia. To avoid inertia you must block the positive vector potential. You have to generate the negative vector potential by spinning the negative mass. There is limit to how much mass you can spin and the speed of light limits how fast you can spin. Therefore there is a definite limit to how much inertia you can block. As you go faster and faster the positive vector potential and therefore the possibility of inertia increases without limit. But you only have a finite amount of negative vector potential to block it.
ReplyDelete2. The UFOCAT database covers about a century. There are 36,500 days in a century. There are 209,000 actual eyewitness reports in the UFOCAT. Dividing that you get 6 per day. But most UFO visits are not reported. There are regions of the world that don't report. The visits can come at a times of the day that the people don't see them and there are places where there are no people. So as a conservative estimate I put the actual number of visits at five times the reported. That is how I arrive at 30 per day. I believe the 209,000 figure is a pretty hard fact.
3. The appearance and disappearance
of UFOs is the REAL mystery. In the chapter in my book I describe in detail HOW UFOs are reported to disappear is exactly how it has been known for a century objects look when they enter an unseen dimension. And it has been known for twenty years that physicists
can not write a theory that encompasses both particles and gravity without having to resort to additional dimensions.
John Mike
John,
ReplyDeleteAgain, thanks for taking the time to enlighten us about Universal Forces.
That said, I would take a real issue with the 30 a day figure. It's a folly IMO to even remotely think of it in this manner. First, most likely, 85-99% of ALL UFO reports are of ORBs - few of which, IF ANY, are UFO physical `crafts'. That is why I am SO interested in ORBs on this website.
If you look at the Hessdalen video yesterday - you can see EXACTLY what I mean. It is THESE phenomena that are being seen worldwide and have been seen worldwide for ages. Indeed, these ORBS have been known to be responsive to human intentionalites on many occasions.
Honestly, that is the real mystery to me as MUCH as the craft UFO thing. Also, I'm not sure how much Phenomenology you have read (Physicists may not be oriented in such a manner) but THAT is MUCH more likely IMO to be related to the `infinite regress' that is sometimes reported of anomaolous phenomena - WITHOUT resorting to extra dimensions. THAT said, IF you are referring to `coming from outside of the timecone' WITHOUT involvking a `extra dimension' (where people and craft live a separate life from us in our dimension)that is cool and I can understand `appearing' in our time-cone.
Indeed, at the risk of sounding foolish to someone who obviously knows much more about science forces than me - I suggest a quick read (LOL) of Husserl's `The Phenomenology of Internat Time-Consciousness' - to understand where I am coming from.
Rick Phillips
PS - I really want you to consider this ORB phenomena and what you think the Physics might be.
An UFO or ZTOMIC REACTOR space craft flies by connecting of both separate NUCLEUS and ELECTRONS of PLASMA state of Uranium 235 , and gets an ELECTROMAGNETIC or LIGHT motion . We earth livers can to control of this new kind of motion by a ZTOMIC REACTOR space craft . Know about a ZTOM particle ( PLASMA of atom ) . ZTOM = atom . Neutral nature with separate NUCLEUS and ELECTRONS are in this ZTOM particle . We earth livers can get the velocity of LIGHT , from this ZTOM particle , by a ZTOMIC REACTOR space craft on the BASE of my UFO BASED eq. M = - ev sq. , wh. M = motion , - e = energy , v sq. = Sound heat , which is a VARIABLE quantity , and contains 3,00,000 kilo calories / ° kelvin , which is equal in the ANTI form of LIGHT velocity speed 3,00,000 kilo meters / second . Thus we earth livers can get the velocity of LIGHT in an ELECTROMAGNETIC form , by a ZTOMIC REACTOR space craft !! Thanks !! For detail , pl. visit on my twitter a/c Akhauri P. P. Sinha :- @AkhauriSinha
ReplyDelete