That said, IMO VERY few of the so-called UFO bloggers spends any time at all with the raw UFO reports at MUFON like I do.... so, I'm perhaps the most likely to call them out about it. And I have as you can see. Because it's been my clarion call that the UFO phenomena is something strongly related to the expanding Orb phenomena... as more and more of the so-called UFO/Orb `callers' and `observers/non callers'
are stepping forth... some in this very blog as Clockers know.
Indeed, yet ANOTHER reader from Missouri has enlightened me when I recieved this e-mail below:
Yes I have also noticed it is almost impossible to find real orb videos on youtube. Several years ago I could find many. If I search for "orbs missouri" , I get hardly any thing substantial, mainly "spam" results. Glad someone else is noticing. I have had many orb-star experiences and never a craft type experience. To me this seems to be the real ufo proof they dont want out. Maybe why no one took Harley Rutledge seriously although he proved it was real without a doubt. 73 Doug
As is often the case when folks are truly open to the unknown... I was ready to learn more about (PHD in Physics) Harley Rutledge and I wasn't disappointed in the least - here's his Wikipedia Link (BTW, YES - I gave the 3 Dollars donation fee at Wikipedia today, you can too.) This guy was a real UFOlogist IMO.
Here's what he found about the UFO phenomena... I will give specific quotes from the Wikipedia article:
red emphasis is mine
Challenged to explain sightings of unidentified lights and luminous phenomena in the sky around Piedmont, Missouri, Dr. Harley Rutledge decided to subject these reports to scientific analysis. He put together a team of observers with college training in the physical sciences, including a large array of equipment: RF spectrum analyzers, Questar telescopes, low-high frequency audio detectors, electromagnetic frequency analyzer, cameras, and a galvanometer to measure variations in the Earth's gravitational field.
The resulting Project Identification commenced in April 1973, logging several hundred hours of observation time. This was the first UFO scientific field study, able to monitor the phenomena in real-time, enabling Rutledge to calculate the objects' actual velocity, course, position, distance, and size.
Observation of the unclouded night sky often revealed "pseudostars" - stationary lights camouflaged by familiar constellations. Some objects appeared to mimic the appearance of known aircraft; others violated the laws of physics. The most startling discovery was that on at least 32 recorded occasions, the movement of the lights synchronized with actions of the observers. They appeared to respond to a light being switched on and off, and to verbal or radio messages. The final results of this project were documented in the 1981 book, Project Identification: The first Scientific Study of UFO Phenomena.
4.5 stars and quite pricey (to keep it out of the hands of the sheeple?)
I answered the reader by mentioning that a couple similar studies of `UFOs' has shown the same thing - UFOs are Orbs and seem to have an attraction to human consciousness. Hot stuff, in the 70's and, evidently, in the 10's.
Thanks for your readership, the above is real important - I hope you share this with your friends via the `buttons' below - it just takes a minute.