Yes, the videos or video versions continue - thanks to my field reporters I bring this to you with less than 1,700 views as I post it: At the least it is background material. Still has the spectacular footage too.
----------------------------------------- See you Tomorrow. ------------------------------------------------- Want to read a fiction thriller? One that mixes aliens and 2012 typestuff? - read the reviews a click from now.
I was once in a restaurant - a `make it in front of you' Japanese restaurant - with my late father in law - when all of a sudden, quite loudly he said, `this is crap'. It turned out that they had forgotten to put the sugar in the dessert. --------- And, indeed, it tasted like crappola. (Initially this article was going to have the word crappola in the title.) And, today, I will not be bringing sugar to the table of UFOlogy.
No; this post will not be `sweet' like the last few days of tracking a most interesting `perplexing' anomalous `UFO' (technically to me an Orb) event that happened in Jerusalem last Saturday early morning. All of the links so far of interest are in yesterdays post, so just go down this page. When you do that you will find the very first thing of interest - the FOURTH video, with different angles, of the `event'.
Even IF you were lucky enough to have been here yesterday - please go look at the video again. -------------------- Pause --------------- So, what do you think of THAT! --------- Someone or something has chosen - to declare the original soundtrack as some kind of hoax, only to replace it with NOTHING and say that essentially nefarious evil forces were messing with the video soundtrack. BTW, nothing seemed `unusual' at all in any of the original soundtracks to me (except for a misperception I had on the timing in the first video).
To me, the removal of what sounded like real reactions, makes the video more one dimensional, and, would bring `into question' the video portion, right? - hmmm, I wonder why? So, does that make the Fourth video fake? (The fourth video, btw, busted the idea that close up views of the event, ie: the first video, was a video of a Wikipedia page and therefore the first video close up was a fake.)
As I said, I compared side by side the video to the Wikipedia picture and FOUND DIFFERENCES -- anyone can say the opposite of the `perception apparent' data - evidently. (This person may not do well in those find the difference games you find at the doctors waiting room.) One can SAY they are identical, evidently, even if they are not -- and use THAT as a claim to refute the first close up `evidence' ( via the videos). And, as I said in response - anyone who wanted to bring doubt to the whole video data could `create' a fake video to say SEE, IT'S FAKE. ------------- One, when writing up these cases, literally has to form judgements about entire circumstances to keep a sense of clarity.
I also find it amusing that in these `rebuttal' pages already up to `counter' the analyzing of `data' by bloggers on the internet (especially after MSNBC did do the video) -- a little tiny stupid point being made is the one videos `tourist' saying something along the lines of `I seen one in Mississippi' - when indeed they don't use the word Mississippi - but - I believe `Midlothian' -- I guess saying the word `Mississippi' and `I seen one' made them sound stupider (but, why would that matter if the video was a video of a Wikipedia page - isn't that stupid enough).
I also find it amazing that the rebuttal is so well organized - it hasn't even been a F-ing week. Oh, I haven't really even gotten to the real rebuttal - the above `Wikipedia' stuff came from nowhere on the internet but the comment section here. Yeah, the `re-buttalists' are out in force dedicating some time to this within a week. (For all I know, the commenter here got it elsewhere, I assume.)
But, frankly, you almost can't blame them, the rebuttalists. Some folks in the Exopolitics camp are seemingly about to come to orgasm over this event - indeed the religious aspect is like some Frosting on the cake -- triple fudge chocolate by death with molasses - bonus - in the whole UFO Disclosure saga. Here's a brief description on TA today: (The Anomalist)
Gary S. Bekkum makes some key points about the supposed presence of aliens and the believability of the many videos alleging to portray an alien visitation. Bekkum highlights the presence of people he calls "the Cyber Tricksters: Shadowy Avatars tracing their thoughts into your home as a play of light and shadow." Be careful what you believe, Bekkum says, for those who are leading the dialogue may very well not be who you think they are, as he notes in the words "Some are artists; some are cons; some are, apparently, quite clever." Alfred Lambremont Webre has a link to a December Wailing Wall UFO video in his report on the Jerusalem/Temple Mount event as a fulfillment of a now deceased UFO prophet's vision, as seen in..."
Can't draw, not a con, cautious (clever,? - perhaps?).
Lead the dialogue - perhaps.
I'd like to believe that the 103 followers this website has gathered in the last year (when I put the widget up) is partly due to the wording I use in nearly every instance -- almost always a qualified answer - it is simply a part of being a market research analyst and part of writing up data and significances. It also is part of responsible UFO blogging as no one has the answers to the anomalousness that occurs. It's why this week I showed you up to 7 SEVEN things the Jerusalem event might represent. (Based on a previous `orbs' dropping from sky event' in 2009 that was also impressive - especially if some folks - like ME - take ORBS very seriously -- I do NOT make assumptions about Orbs - which is what I saw in the video, I did NOT see alien craft.) I also hope my analysis positioning was a reason why the respected website TA used UDCC's post as it's headline yesterday, Groundhogs Day, (my favorite movie) http://www.anomalist.com/ on the whole Jerusalem UFO event.
LOL. Perhaps that is why the followers are here - they dig the Orb talk too.
Ok, all that said, I do NOT back off, yet at least, the possible significance of this event.Again - IF it is not an elaborate hoax. (I'm reminded that what gave `credibility' to the Georgia Bigfoot hoax a few years back was the fact that the one man was a policeman. Which would be laughable, to some, but not in the MSM. -- In this instance `the number of videos' is what gives it significance. Credibility can be easy to buy is all I can say - so, who is to say at this moment - time will tell and time we have.)
In just checking again, I see more of the originals are `vanishing' -- someone sense they have a goldmine for rights? Someone about to announce the end of the hoax? Someone worried that the truth may get out? (See, as an analyst, I present choices as part of any analysis.) Or, just part of the Crapology of UFOlogy.
But, I'm not alone in my analysis as the blog NightShirt by Eric Wargo has posted - http://thenightshirt.com/?p=960 which is appreciated, as I think NightShirt presents very readable far out stuff that is well written too. - Oh, btw, here's how CosmicLog handled the Jerusalem UFO - http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/01/31/5962284-jerusalem-videos-stir-ufo-buzz - the sum-up from them - I think this is going to be one of those shaky-camera sightings that will live on in UFO lore without making much of an impact in the wider world.
I'm not exactly sure how many `shaky' cameras are needed for a proof level. My guess is CosmicLog is hoping no more arise.
(I guess I must have missed being distracted? I mean WTF, all of the videos were quite legible visually to me IMO. So, is `shaky images' the reason for his rejection/questioning? As I said up on top - one can swear that two pictures are identical - even if they are not. And, one can swear the videos are shaky.)
Finally, one reason for the near utter lack of response to what COULD be a significant event, is the LACK of a `voice' of UFOs - other than perhaps MUFON - even 60+ years after the Foofighters (please look in my sidebar for the label Bigelow and Robert Bigelow) - MUFON being a shady bunch of old white men perhaps - don't believe me? read this - http://naturalplane.blogspot.com/2011/02/new-contention-at-mufon.html --- indeed, Lon and I were some of the first ones bringing real spotlights to the power within MUFON.
Yeah, Crapola. ----------------------------- More to come, pending developments - a final review and positioning at the least. Thanks for all the comments too. ----------------------------- Sell Books Online at Cash4Books.net
It's 2022 - Sell Your Old Textbooks For Cash - Other Books Too Check ISBN Easily
A MESSAGE ABOUT UFO DISCLOSURE AND THIS WEBPAGE
MANY PEOPLE COME TO THIS WEBSITE UNAWARE THAT UFO DISCLOSURE IN THE USA OCCURRED IN LATE 2011, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALLY TOOK THE POSITION THAT NO HUMAN-ALIEN INTERACTION HAD EVER OCCURRED; AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT WAS NOT WITHHOLDING INFORMATION ABOUT THE UFO PHENOMENA FROM THE PUBLIC. YOU WILL FIND THE LINK TO THAT OFFICIAL ANNOUNCEMENT AND THE ONE DAY MEDIA REACTION - IN THIS SIDEBAR. THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF UDCC ABOUT THE ANNOUNCEMENT IS THAT IT AMOUNTS TO `SUPPRESSION WITH DISCLOSURE'.
NOW, THAT IS NOT TO SUGGEST THAT TONS OF REAL GOVERNMENT INFORMATION ABOUT THE UFO PHENOMENA DOESN'T EXIST AND HASN'T BEEN RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC ALSO - BECAUSE AGAIN IN THIS SIDEBAR, YOU WILL SEE TONS OF SUCH DOCUMENTS. NSA DOCUMENTS, FBI DOCUMENTS, ETC ETC.
BUT NOW, IN 2020 - THE MSM IS `OUT OF STEP' IF IT EVEN SUGGESTS THAT THE UNKNOWN IN OUR SKIES ARE `ALIENS'. UDCC'S HOPES THAT THIS POINT IS NOT LIGHTLY TAKEN AS IT IMO HAS INDEED ALREADY ALTERED THE WAY THE UFO PHENOMENA IS COVERED BY A SPINELESS MSM.
UDCC HAS ALSO NOW WRITTEN OVER 1300 POSTS ON THE SUBJECT MATTER - MOST OF THE IMPORTANT DETAILED ANALYSIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN REMOVED AND PUT INTO MY E-BOOKS ABOUT MY OPINIONS OF THE UFOLOGY AND MASS COMMUNICATION POSITIONING OF UFOLOGY BY THE MSM.
YOU CAN SUPPORT INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF UFOLOGY BY PURCHASING MY E-BOOKS.
FINALLY, IF YOU ARE VISITING FOR THE FIRST TIME - FOR BEST RESULTS - ABSORB THIS WEBSITE - SLOWLY - DON'T CHEAT YOURSELF OF THIS CHANCE TO UNDERSTAND A BIT MORE ABOUT THE SUBJECT MATTER!
Do You Like This Blog?
THE AMAZING PEOPLE WHO READ THIS BLOG
A Great UFO Read - And, Jupiter For Your Desk
AMAZON PRODUCTS THAT SUPPORT THIS WEBSITE - A FLOATING ORB BLUETOOTH SPEAKER - AND MORE
THE MODERN DAY UFO MOTIF IDENTIFIED BY UDCC - THE ANSWER TO 99% OF UFO EXPERIENCES
The `UFO Motif' is a vigorous plasma Orb that catches ones attention - morphs, often into a structured shape as it comes very close to the observer location - then it often morphs one more time into a structured `Neighborhood UFO' (aka an Impossible Craft perception) - this is where folks then `see' low flying, slow moving `Triangles' or other UFO shapes - often followed (after departure) by `helicopters' or `military jets' - both of which are simply part of the total perception. The `Neighborhood UFO' then often passes out of perception range to NOT be reported `downstream' or `upstream' usually - proving that it is a localized experience (often tied to intentionalities on the ground and with humans). EXTREME close encounters can easily produce the perceptions of missing time.
---------------------------
Note The Dictionary Words Associated With The Very Concept Of A Motif
--------------------------
a short succession of notes producing a single impression; a brief melodic or rhythmic formula out of which longer passages are developed.
- read the reviews a click from now.
