But, today's post isn't really about William's experience - or even my analysis - but about something that William refers to (almost in passing) in his post... that this is NOT the first time he has witnessed UFO crafts or anomalous sky phenomena - and his wonderment about how many folks had the same perception he did in September in the cars surrounding him on the bridge. Did they too see the UFO?
So... two things really... 1... seeing too many UFOs....2 ....did others see the same thing. (And I could add 3 - the slippery slope of what constitutes now and real of phenomenology.) How about we take a look at `seeing too many UFOs' first; something that almost amazingly I have not talked about as UFO theory over 1,300+ posts.
First... let me answer I think the easiest part of my questions above... I DON'T think that other motorists saw the UFO like William or at least VERY VERY few of them.... and don't think it had anything to do with their attentiveness....well maybe just a little bit......IMO the few that saw anything didn't have it register in their brain and probably dismissed the immediate impression without consciousness as a bird or something.
Not expecting the impossible (unlike William with a heighten awareness who is aware because of prior anomalous sky perceptions) they simply don't fold the perception into immediate actualization for their retina..... belief sets taking control of screening anomalous data (that could be a safety hazard while driving on a bridge too). Indeed, back in the earliest days of this blog I provided real estimate based on USA survey data questioning that suggested that only 1% or less of the US population had ever seen any anomalous sky phenomena. Taking all that into account and the brevity of the experience... William WAS probably that 1% representative. (Funny as William very represents the 99% in his view on reality.)
But... now, let's tackle the deeper issues.,,,,,lol.
The people who are seeing `too many UFOs' in the skies - fall into only a very few categories. ONE - Folks like the Facebook group I'm a member of (with 390 others) and have been touting around UDCC for the past few months - In The Field - Active Observers In The Field - this group has active folks looking for the anomalous in the daytime (like myself) and night sky. And TWO - the callers/summoners - who since about 2002-2003 or so - have been able to demonstrate their expectations.
And then there is group THREE - like William - and I suspect the vast majority of the 1% (who are NOT callers or actively seeking) who at some point in their life saw UFO one and then at some later point...or points... had the same perceptions again.,,,, and who were then relegated to putting that somehow into their expected reality mix..... without really any support for such things within society.... `Hey, I saw another UFO yesterday' --- (and the folks slink away from the one announcing such an event).
Humorously, both groups one and two - explain it in different ways in general (this is not to say that overlap exists for one and two as it certainly does) - and the number TWO group (callers and summoners) is a bit easier surprisingly. You see, the callers and summoners are convinced of THEIR contact methodology (since it works) and in nearly EVERY instance... that contact is mental and could be called meditative (to prayerful)..... to bleeding over into VERY religious. Additionally, these people `know the event' is for them - and what they are practicing to elicit the actualization. Readers of this blog know that I've identified DOZENS over the past few years.
Unfortunately for the callers/summoners - one of the most prominent callers has gotten caught up with the sleazy side of YouTube UFOlogy hoaxers - and many in group one are quick to brand all those who call and summon fakers and hoaxers... even seem to have a lot of their own more `science' view of UFOs vulnerable to such `callers'... it's as if their point of view is SO SHORT and new - to NOT have known that callers existed well before the YouTube UFO hoaxer crowd.
So... let's talk theoretically about group ONE - those `science oriented' `tech' finders of U.F.O.'s in our collective skies. Group one people using not thought and meditation (they believe) but modern technology to find those anomalous lights in our skies. High powered binoculars... night vision cameras... the most advanced high powered video cameras....etc, you get the idea (comparing their finds to sky charts, flight charts, and sky debris just to be sure)..... and sure enough... JUST LIKE THE CALLERS... the group one seekers - also find what they were seeking within our common consensus.
Could it be that simple?
Could it be `intentions'?
Now, group one will tell you that they have NO expectations or intentions... really I say? They, like the group two callers, are NOT successful every time... and yet expect to be successful .. which is why they continue to look and seek. The groups IMO have few real differences... each has belief in methods which are rewarded by anomalous knowledge actualization.... seemingly for human benefit for one group and for NO REASON at all to the other.
Both of the above groups - the callers and the technology seekers - seemingly have a limited time-frame in which their own locality `yields' those anomalous seemingly conscious lights in the sky. Something ONLY someone like myself would know having watch the rise and fall of many callers and `hot areas' (one of the members in In The Field FB Group often talks about how her area was HOT a few years ago... these events go in sine-waves IMO - to on/off - but rarely to never last even 5 years to most folks in most locations). Oh... most of the `tech' folk have been at it so short a time-frame that they may not even realize it will pass too.
IMO - Bruce Duensing got very close to what I'm describing above as `intentionalities' - he called it - Are UAP's A Quantum Detection System? - and IF I'm right - that it is `intentions' mixed with a bit of our local reality conditions and expectations - and that it is repeatable and demonstrable (like some of the callers like Dean Clark have shown) - then a perfect reason for the authorities to discourage this type of info becoming widespread is one of my old and favorite blog posts called The Danger Of A Billion Magicians.... read both the above links if you dare to rock your UFOlogy thinking to the core.
Again.... both of the above groups have some folks with HUNDREDS of videos ..... of Orbs. The anomalous. That they have seen. Don't tell them otherwise...... But, IMO... both of those groups combined are probably just 1% of the 1% who have ever had an UFO phenomena perception. A literal sliver of a sliver.... folks who in all reality are not going to attract the MSM..... for fear of what it would mean to both `other' 99%'s.
Okay... a quick and final look at group three ... with Philosophers like William Dudley Bass..... and heady folks of all kinds. Speaking of `heady folks' .... I have to say I was quite flattered to have William say these things about me and my mind in his post... see the below: Again from William's post Here... IF You Didn't Read It Already
There is more to a psychological, synergistic/synchronicity/spiritual component, too.
I saw this after watching alleged whistleblower Corey Goode being interviewed by David Wilcock on the latter’s Cosmic Disclosure presentation on Gaiam TV. Been reading and researching a lot on the UFO literature from opposing ends of the spectrum, from Dr. Michael Salla and whistleblowers such as Corey Goode and Clark C. McClelland on one hand and Disclosure Clock Countdown man Rick Phillips, iconoclastic guy who reminds me of Gurdjieff’s take on reality.
Phillips turns everything upside down as he discombobulates conventional interpretations of UFO phenomena and perturbs conditioned ideas regarding news, mass media, and alternative media. He pulls aside the sheets of paper diagrammed with carefully researched flowcharts of the Cabal to reveal the air and the imaginations beneath as gas and mind, themselves possibly projections of greater holographic dramas unfolding in the software code of consciousness for two billion years or more.
Having dealt with lots of weird stuff, and after he challenged himself to think deeper upon his experiences of observations and the power of the conscious mind, indeed to reflectupon reflections, Rick Phillips discerned a common “UFO motif” behind “99% of UFO experiences.” Using motifs as linked successions “of notes producing a single impression,” he determined the most common UFO motif is “a vigorous plasma Orb that catches one’s attention” and then morphs into “structured” shapes, morphs again, morphs into recognizable patterns, then “passes out of perception.” Passes out of perception, and perception is as much mental as physical. More importantly, Phillips notes such experiences tend to be localized and are usually “tied to intentionalities on the ground and with humans.” I would add human personalities, as in UFO experiences are “tied to intentionalities and” personalities as well as interpretations by everyday consciousness minds streaming mindlessly as radio signals stream thru radios without considering the power of consciousness to morph perception, intention, and personality.
Okay - I'm blushing... being compared to one of my hero's of thought - Gurdjieff
And, I won't go into Williams FINE ANALYSIS of the possibilities he experienced - please read his entire piece - as I would be nearly in agreement with all his main conjectures. I do think the fine minds are tuning into something that is a version of the truth of the anomalous.
Anyway... back to seeing `too many UFOs' - early in 2015 I had the same feeling. I had taken to looking closely with high powered binoculars at the Chemtrails in our collective skies - especially on the few Carolina Blue sky days after the passing of weather fronts. Because on several occasions I've seen `strange things going on in or around' Chemtrails... from movement of something `down' the Chemtrail from the `plane'... to an Orb on more than one occasion. And, in one week after such occurrences...saw TWO Orbs..(one each time) by simply scanning the skies with my binoculars.
My thoughts were ---- IS THIS POSSIBLE?
It's a bit unnerving IMO. Hilariously, I don't consider myself in any of the three groups.... just reflecting on reflections..... Thanks for the stimulus Mr. Bass.
============================================
Please Explore
This Website
