So, 7 years later and endless rumors later, are there ANY `UFO' videos of the event itself? Did the supposedly held video by Dan Aykroyd ever surface? Is there really any such proof? Well, as fans of my UFO material coverage know, just the other day at Amazing UFO Stories I brought a whole slew of videos concerning the incident - but, when I looked back at my own post - perhaps I too was overlooking something.... so, let me bring to you below - the `curious' videos of the 2006 Chicago O'Hare UFO Incident:
First - NONE were released in anything resembling a `current' fashion - remember, in YouTube was already around by late 2006 - let alone in 2007 when the FAA denied the event and the crappola hit the fan so to speak. So, we are to assume somehow that `security' was tight enough to stop anyone from the Airport grounds or passengers approaching the airport from videotaping the incident?..... Of course not. And never could they know WHO or HOW MANY folks might have such footage - the FACT that NONE surfaced at the time.... suggests.... that except for something stashed away for profit later -- that the footage simply doesn't exist -- regardless of how much it would be hoped for..... OR does it?
For those of you that read my post the other day - http://strangeufovideo.blogspot.com/2013/12/november-2006-chicago-ohare-airport-ufo.html .... how about this idea. Since the whole incident ONLY has `perhaps' two photos associated with the event (one from a planeseat) - doesn't it seem strange to outright reject one particular video that CLAIMS to be real based on it `not fitting the description'?
So, with that in mind (and with myself in the rejection camp) I thought it was worth a real viewing of one persons `video evidence' and their personal claim in the upload of the video:
YouTube Link To Video And Comments And Explanation - 67K views, unlikely original uploader, in French, 2-1 Negative to Positive ratio of opinion - first the video: Uploaded 4-3-2009
In a nutshell, the evidence rejects this video because it is TOO LOW compared to the other witness accounts (this video the person claims the UFO is 750 ft off the ground and the witnesses said more like 1800 feet of a 2000 ceiling...... Reading between the lines one gets the impression that whoever shot the film was a `known' person and didn't want any attention.... Isn't it curious that those `official accounts' that are used to reject this video don't have a `beginning' --- (they do have the straight up with a hole in the clouds ending) -- why couldn't this video be of BEFORE the `reported sighting'? Any reason at all? Do UFO's suddenly ONLY operate from one altitude the whole UFO experience? ..... See my point?
So, the first curious thing is the flat out rejection when `proof is presented' .... but, of course, one must be cautious as `this proof' also exists.... is it any more likely?
Uploaded 4-25-2007 (about the time you'd expect someone who was P.O.'ed by the refusal of the government to fess up to release it) - it has 511K views and a 3/1 positive to negative ratio of public opinion.
Yeah, a huckster - faker, had the first video.
And, of course, the most famous of the FAKE 2006 Chicago O'Hare UFO Video - The Famous Video of a Magazine Article with pictures of the UFO. Indeed, the uploaded this explanation for their TWO WEEK hoax on April 3rd, 2009
And, remember - all of the above was easily out of hand rejected due to the UFO object being `too low' in comparison to the best photo evidence - that I once again bring to you below:
I Mean Really?
Does that craft look 1800 feet in the sky?===================================================================
When I detail my upcoming book about the Jerusalem Orb of 2011 I will talk about once again such disinformation.
Always remember - UFO Disclosure (anagram) Ludicrous Foes!
I've rolled my 2006 book on the incident into another book - now both are available together!
on sale until next Tuesday for 1.99