UFO Disclosure Countdown Clock: Mid 2011 - UFOs, What Are They; And, How Does That Relate To UFO Disclosure

Every once in awhile, it is probably a good idea to present an overview to my readers of the full range of my ideas, opinions, and analysis, on UFOs and UFO Disclosure. And, what better time than the middle of the year during the Week of the Fourth Of July - the day to celebrate our so-called `freedoms'. So, are all of you Clockers ready? (Clockers is the term used by myself to describe those in the `leaders' area of the sidebar who are thereby altered to each and every update - these folks represent a huge percentage of total visits as do those that return daily yet have never become a public leader - or follower.)

First, let's define UFOs - the simplest being Unidentified Flying Objects - the `things' and `phenomena' seemingly in our atmosphere from the ground, on up, to outer space. And, using that as a starting point, let me make it clear immediately that we have MULTIPLE `things' and phenomena going on which prevents a lumping of all UFOs into any ONE category ---- which is why `disclosure' is a can of worms. A can unlikely to be opened too far.

Perhaps the most strong feelings and thoughts I have about UFOs are about what is commonly referred to as ORBS; - balls of light - that seemingly can have all kinds of possible attributes attached to them, - even including, occasionally, consciouslike behaviour and actions. The ORB phenomena is so open-ended as to defy a single description.

Indeed, this kind of ORB, the conscious type, could even be an above ground Earth atmosphere -- LIFEFORM - as I have speculated before http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2008/10/could-some-rods-grow-into-orbs-could.html and much as Bruce Duensing speculates here - http://materialintangible.blogspot.com/2011/06/prteliminary-conclusions-and-strong.html - and certainly, the Government has no incentive to suggest this possibility. (Thinking of UFO Disclosure.)

Indeed, if you read Bruce's post above - one can only imagine a scenario of humans `evolving' into machine/hybrids living in `caves' (structures) while an advanced evolving lifeform begins to rule the skies and even the planet itself. Something not beyond the realm of being possible, despite being fantastic.

OR, and likely, IMO, is that some ORB phenomena literally could be remnants of dead human spirit - continuing in the phenomenology structure IMO. These most likely are the ones close to the ground or barely showing up in photographs. But, or perhaps, OR, - the same phenomena could be a `calling' into the unknown or showing of the `unknown' in our phenomenology structure which ONLY involves the human intentional consciousness. OR, the same phenomena could be an on-going `living phenomena' that occasionally only shows itself as a glowing sphere. (see previous paragraph)

Clockers and others know that these ORBS, these glowing spheres, have been described as tiny when near the ground to seemingly large enough to see well up into the Earths atmosphere. (But, think about it - these small ones would NOT be seen very high into the atmosphere.) Daily, these glowing balls of light are reported to MUFON and recorded on video cameras and uploaded onto YouTube - and other internet services. Heck, some even get reported to me at UDCC while events are happening. (The NYC event in October for example.)

And, in very rare occasions - these ORBS have been seen to transform into --- well ---- you name it.

ANYTHING.

Bigfoots, UFO Craft, Aliens, Owls, etc etc etc. ANYTHING. ----------------------- BUT NOW, I THINK WE ENTER A DIFFERENT CATEGORY - THAT BEING A PERCEPTION STRUCTURE. Of NON-Permanent, `temporal beings/phenomena'.

Briefly, the above is my belief that some phenomenology structures are indeed `overlayed' with a `perception structure' of non-ordinariness. Temporarily. And, without mass.

I doubt VERY MUCH that the government has ANY interest talking about the ORB phenomena of `lights in the sky' or near the ground - IN AN MASS MEDIA MANNER. It simply is a can of worms to them. It also is viewed as a very transitory event except in certain instances - which I will expand upon shortly. And, obviously, if reality is so pliable as to permit PERCEPTION OVERLAYS - our leaders are hardly going to `confirm' something so seemingly bizarre.

In short, whatever the light balls are - THEY are not `aliens' of which a `Government' could do much about - as they seem more related to human intentionality's and localized perceptions. Why should the government come forward and say something like - "yeah, a bit of the reality you can experience has no foundation in concrete mass containing phenomena - and maybe a part of what you perceive - is something that is `not much less than pure fantasy to a localized consciousness".
--------------

Want that to get even murkier? (How would that be possible right?)

I also believe that mind control - via who knows what means - even mass hypnosis possibly - might make one question ones perceptions even more - (read this link to understand just how weak most of us are to manipulation - http://histmyst.blogspot.com/2011/06/instant-induction-hypnosis-and-missing.html) now, does the government have or use such stuff - how would I know? I don't. But, it indeed could be ONE explanation for the bizarre nature of `missing time' from `aliens'.

But, it is possible, and must be admitted when considering the range of what can seemingly be seen by one person - which is what the `phenomena' of many `sightings' seem to be. (By that I mean, even strange nighttime ORB sightings in clear skies should be seen by MANY or even videotaped by many if they are REAL phenomena and NOT perceptual data in some manner.) (The endless valid question, "why so little, to no confirmation videos, of these phenomena"? Answer, the phenomena is a perceptual overlay of one person.)

The above huge range of phenomena called ORBS covers easily 95% of all MUFON reports. IMO. (But, unlike the MSM that will tell you to ignore this 95% -- `because of misidentifications' -- the ORB phenomena is such a can of worms that Governments will NEVER talk about it. Even if it seems to be the majority of the unknown. It simply won't fit into soundbites, and, even messes with the human `religion' aspect/powers - when we say some of these phenomena are based on beliefs.)

Then, finally, we come to what most folks think of when they hear the word UFO, --- the UFO Crafts, of various shapes and sizes. Really only a sliver of UFO reports on MUFON.

But, IMO, even more so - they (the crafts) seem to have the `was I the only one who saw this thing' - attribute. And, once again, even the multiple person experiences could simply be the result of instant hypnosis techniques shown in the link above in this post. (Could `we humans' even be being manipulated by our environment?)

And, once again, at least to me, reports of crafts, without confirmation, especially in this `video age' at the personal level era we have entered, - limits or should limit - ones `belief' in any individual recording of the anomalous.

I won't even mention the hoaxers and CGI tricksters. (Sorry.)
-----------

But, yes, I do believe that some of these observed` crafts' to be `real' in our phenomenology time-cone; but, I doubt very much that they `outnumber' the `perceptual ones'.

Indeed, IF these REAL craft do exist - I suspect that `invisibleness' via cloaking is certainly a likelihood (not seen with unaided eye) the extreme in cloaking. And, most likely, that is the case IMO with these advanced craft. Which, of course, ANSWERS the question as to `where are they' and why do we not see them more often?
---------

IMO, the real question about these `real' crafts is - WHO DRIVES THEM?

Humans, Aliens, Computers or something in-between biological and mechanical beings. And, logically, an alien race advanced enough to know of intelligence here on Earth; that they would like to observe, - and, advanced enough that they can `send a craft' to do it (observe) - would also be advanced enough to NOT need a biological captain of the ship so to speak IMO.

(Therefore, my take is that FEW if ANY crafts would need to be `manned' by aliens.)
----------

To me, it also makes sense that as the signal of mankind's radio waves invades the universe - that other very advanced lifeforms (maybe humanlike, maybe not) may indeed wish to monitor us -- if for nothing more than entertainment. Indeed, if things like `craft' can get here, perhaps even `instantly', they would also be able to transmit whatever they are monitoring back to their home base (planet) instantly, IMO.

And, when you are watching HUMANS for entertainment, what could be better? http://ufodisclosurecountdownclock.blogspot.com/2009/09/are-humans-entertainment-for-billion.html

Certainly, the Government has NO interest in telling us all that we are monitored in ways beyond our belief - and that we are fodder and entertainment for beings beyond our human understandings.
-------------

But, to muddy even this scenario - I must admit that it is possible, if not likely, that our government may know how to build nearly the same type of craft as humans imagine seeing and report seeing. (And, certainly, I have no way of knowing `the likely %' of `alien vs human' seen sightings.) So, yes, `UFOs' could be driven by humans within the world government structure or rich humans outside of the government structures.

But, remember, EVEN if Governments have a craft via unknown means, (figured out by the human brain or reverse engineered)it doesn't mean the human mind has figured out how to instantaneously put that craft outside the time-cone for interstellar travel (IF that is what is happening, which I doubt, regardless of Solar Warden crappola).
------------

(After all, its possible that the number of `visiting' races may be limited STRICTLY to the radius of our `radio footprint' in the universe - and that NONE - or nearly NONE - of the `alien visitors' we have are arriving via loops avoiding the time-cone. Perhaps ALL `aliens' arrive in manners below the speed of light in other words. Which means we could expect more and more as time went onward.)

And, certainly, Governments do NOT want to talk about these advanced technologies, if they have them, or our `enemies' (humans that don't look like us or talk our language) will becoming enlightened. So, no disclosure about advanced government technology is near IMO.
--------------

Which leads to how Governments seem to be handling `the UFO disclosure problem' - as the peoples beliefs grow in the phenomena.

Answer - with soft disclosure; ie: NOT confirming aliens or any concern about aliens, BUT, releasing to what amounts to be `old dusty files'. (A 24 hour story.) That nitpickers can go thru and that the MSM can/will summarize in soundbites of under 90 seconds; and that also will leave open the possibility that the events are `illusions' (which as I've told you - I do believe that these perceptual overlays do happen) - but that all in all are NOT worrisome (much as they reiterated in the late 60's).
------------

But, is that true? Because some things are worrisome about UFOs to the Government IMO - at least a little bit.

For example, if there was no worry, why the FREQUENT reports of helicopters and fighter jets in the areas of UFOs/or ORBs sightings? They MUST be reacting for SOME reason - as if to respond to a `breach' in the `structure' almost IMO. Perhaps closing some portal perhaps? Reacting to changes in the balance of what is REAL? Who knows?
---------------

Also worrisome to the Governments, IMO, is the very very limited cases of apparent `alien'/entity contact - with `investigations' recently funded by the Robert Bigelow MUFON quick investigation teams. Indeed, it is my contention that Mr. Bigelow is almost a liaison/processor of information available to the Government - and the organizations he runs and supports - from the defunct NIDS onward.

I would hope I don't have to mention to Clockers the relationship that Mr. Bigelow has had to the top notch FAA pilot reports of UFOs for over a decade; without ever once being questioned by the MSM about those reports or analysis or investigations. Also, lets not forget what NIDS had to say about the Triangles seen flying in the skies - http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5897539/ns/technology_and_science-space/t/flying-triangle-sightings-rise/.

And THAT silence and partnership between the Governments association with Mr. Bigelow and the MSM is very nefarious IMO. UFOs are to be treated as ENTERTAINMENT. (And remember who controls your licence.)
-----------------

Which brings into specter the whole disinformation campaigns that Governments like to run in areas they don't want to talk about. Of course.

And, since they are in cahoots with the MSM on how these UFO matters are to be covered - the bits they do feed to the public tend to be suspect - especially the so-called `analysis' often offered by the MSM after UFO events. Such as the Stephenville Texas UFOs, The O'Hare UFO incident, etc. The `interviewing' of witness with credibility, etc.
-----------

And, since the clamp is on in these areas - one would have to suspect that these things are WORRISOME to the Governments -- and is that something you think that they want to DISCLOSE? Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee.
------------

So, in some manner, at some level - we appear to be having REAL events occur - that matter on some level to `Governments'.

Is it simply to keep and maintain the `official line' as humans being the ultimate `thing' that the universe has ever offered (for God and religious folk) and the whole religious issue thing? Perhaps; but, IMO it probably is more than that - it is probably FEAR. Yes, fear.

Because, events in restricted spaces (O'Hare) and MILE WIDE Crafts (or even 1/2 mile wide) - (Stephenville initial sighting) are NOT something taken lightly to be told to the public - on a variety of levels, including making the Government look weak.

Indeed, UFOs represent that flaw in our `security' at a level well beyond our `enemies' we swear to in the MSM.
---------------

But, `control of disclosure' , isn't ultimately in the hands of the Government - or the MSM - if `aliens' wanted to do elsewise.

And, until VERY recently - yes, literally that day in Oct. 2010 in NYC - the one that slightly validated the UFO prediction made by Stanley Fulham - the `aliens' seemed content to only slowly increase allowed `observations' - if they were increasing them at all. However, the NYC event was seemingly an allowed observation that lasted long enough for the MSM to even conduct man on the street interviews while in progress.

And, then, just months later, the murky truths and produced falsehoods about the Jerusalem Orb Event by the MSM in early 2011. Of course, both events also presented with the typical `trump card' `Ignore This' - sidebars - be they `balloon releases' and/or obvious fake videos (in the case of the Jerusalem UFO).

(But, I must add my own caution to the most recent events I site above, NYC and Jerusalem, and as Clockers know --- I find the co-incidence of the elevated human emotional state during both those events - worldwide and localized - to have been stupendous and suspicious in their co-incidence to the events. The Chilean minor rescue for NYC's event, and the peak of the Egyptian winter riots for the Jerusalem event. This suspicion makes me less certain about the `alien escalation').
-----------------

Even more annoying to my readers (probably) - is that I don't even discount the possibility that some of the phenomena is Fortean (or Trickster) in `cause' - literally. But, that is a discussion for another day.
-------------------

But, IMO, the ORBS phenomena does seem to be escalating - perhaps even rapidly - some internet links this spring said there was a HUGE increase in the tagword UFO on YouTube this spring -- a HUGE HUGE increase. And I believe that as one who literally searches for those for my readers. The question of course, is this simply the result of expansion of our video technology to the ground level for all people? Or, is the phenomena increasing - I believe it is both.

And, IF the ORB phenomena has much of its BEING in human intentionality's and consciousness - could the SHEER NUMBER OF HUMAN BEINGS CONSCIOUSNESSES BE `TRIGGERING' some phenomena? Has consciousness in its literal form and perhaps with added artificial intelligence in our biosphere (noosphere)(even via the internet) - reached a tipping point to elicit these `events and responses'? Is the `emotional' element of humans involved?

Will we `know' anymore 5 years from now that we don't know today? One thing we do know - the MSM can avoid ANY issue it chooses or is told to avoid. Completely. For decades.
================
And, they, the media, have little incentive when it comes to UFO Disclosure. The Exopolitics and `Interstellar Humans via Black Budgets' are strictly off limits for serious discussion - As are `aliens walking on Earth'. (Somehow `aliens in the sky' is not as nefarious evidently.) Or, heaven forbid - they live here or seeded us.

At best, to the MSM, the `aliens' have arrived recently, just watch us and don't abduct us, and are not to be worried about. The same `line' of the governments.
-----------------

So, IF UFO Disclosure comes, it is likely to be thru the aliens and the common man - in some sort of over the top unbelievable display - such as at a Fireworks Display in Washington D.C. tomorrow night or similar event over the Hudson River.

As, at this point, something needs to one-up the Jerusalem Orb event - if we are to consider that a significant alien contact escalation is in progress. (Even an identical event to the JO would be as impressive if done in front of gathered crowds.)
------------------------------
Finally, I do have the opinion that an impasse has been reached in the `national coverage' of the UFO phenomena. We must remember that is was only 5 years ago that the O'Hare witness was in silhouette on the MSM. Or, how quickly the media covered and UNcovered the Stephenville Incident. OR, how the `idea of confirmation videos' was handled in the Jerusalem Orb Event.

Indeed, until the `London UFO' of last week (which to me showed a staged street scene like NYC's, and BAD CGI of a `Mothership' - providing a needed `escalation' for coverage by the MSM in the UK) - which really wasn't covered here in the USA - it shows that MORE will be needed for MSM national coverage.
--------------------
And, lastly for this mid year 2011 overview, I provide this latest in science. A link that shows that NOTHING at all - can produce - LIGHT. (For those who wonder where the ORB light comes from.) - Moving mirrors make light from nothing - http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110603/full/news.2011.346.html
============================
Thanks for being a Clocker. IF you are new to UDCC, please click in the sidebar the `leaders' widget - so you will be a Clocker too.
===========================
===========================
Just as the Sun Powers the Earth - You Too Can Have It Provide Power To You - Anywhere. Portable Solar.
COMPACT SOLAR GENERATOR IN BRIEFCASE DESIGN