The Noömass Hypothesis: Is Dark Matter Made of Knowledge? (Eric Wargo)

If I am any judge of the intellect of my audience... and I'm speaking of the Clockers out there (repeat users of this website).. then I'm sure you have been enjoying the newer writings of Eric Wargo at his blog called Nightshirt. Indeed, I'm sure many of you have dug down into Eric's blog and found the gem... the very next one down from yesterday's post.

Eric's logic ... again... overlaps what I have also been saying about the phenomenology and indeed with the anomalous. Indeed, my simplest manner in explaining my Phillips Phenomenology is that `space' is defined by the `information' within it.... I think you will see the parallels that Eric's mind is following. Th
at said... lets look at just a few of his kernels of useful thinking about the BIG picture.

First.. here's his post directly http://thenightshirt.com/?p=1462 and as you can see the FIRST thing that Eric does and what I `argued' with Joe Capp the other day is that `aliens' are to be thought of as `multiple types' --- entities is a far better word for the general encounter with the anomalous IMO. Eric say's it like this..:
Yet if we confine interstellar “expansion” to the expansion of the noösphere, the enlargement of knowledge of the cosmos, then a more realistic picture emerges, one that conforms not at all badly to the long history of human interaction with seemingly nonhuman technology (leaving aside humanoid visitors—I’m referring mainly to orbs, spheres, and other technologies that don’t seem like they have little pilots inside).

And, as Clockers know... I stress as often as I can that orbs are the real UFO's.
========================

Folks, Eric is just starting to up his thinking in this post as he next ... again... goes on to point out a paper that shows that `PROBES' unmanned space science essentially ... have been shown mathematically (in July 2013) to have been able to `investigate' the entire Milky Way with below speed of light platforms that are FLUNG around stars to gain momentum to go ELSEWHERE in the universe... so, as I've said and Eric and the logic concludes that PROBES are simply HERE in some manner or have the mathematical probability of being here. (I'd still say this is a bit optimistic - as IMO, slinging probes around stars over and over, to gain speed, is a bit iffy.) Anyway... that probe link from Eric's post is Why Self Replicating Probes Could be Abundant.
---------------------
And his post is just beginning to lay it out.... he then gets into the noosphere thinking and as Clockers know.. I have a book about that, well actually two that touch on it:

                          99 CENTS                          1.99

                                                                                   I'D LIKE TO THANK THE PERSON FROM

                                                                                     THE UK THAT `BORROWED' THE ABOVE                                                                                        BOOK YESTERDAY AS AN AMAZON PRIME

                                                                                                               MEMEBER             

============================================

UDCC Bringing you REAL thinkers about Esoteric Thought.

===================================

===============================
4.99

The Heavy Stuff

MY LATEST BOOK

====================================================