link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bju3pHUL45w
==============================================
If you looked at the link immediately above you can see all the talk about Underground Nukes being the cause of strange sounds and the Virginia Earthquake. If that stuff is news to you as far as the internet rumor mill - you might want to check that out.
=============================
Updated my Newsblog today - interesting science story about antibiotics and what they do to not only those that use them but future generations too. Stats show, UDCC readers dig science.
=============================
My thanks to the person who bought
from my blogs yesterday. See the other item purchased at my Newsblog above.===============================
Another Strange Noise In The Sky - July 11th - went on supposedly for over an hour:
link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZbt4ZkIUbE (20K views/listens)
========================================
Want a good read about one of the very early alien abductions? One with lots of insights and good comments from readers? Comments as heavy as this tease from Bruce Duensing, who may be close to a fuller theory on UFOs than most?
Outside of the quasi-theological debates on the nature of the phenomenon and their silly behaviors, I suspect, these gentlemen came into contact with an atmospheric phenomenon that
1 induced physiological effects that made both unconscious and one to enter a quasi dream state while unconscious.
2.The dream content and context was based on the initial perception of a flying machine.
3. They projected the image of a flying machine on the phenomenon as a "closest match"
4. The phenomenon was certainly energetic as they were not physically touched.
5. The energy signature is unique and unknown. If it became common rather than comparatively rare, we'd all be as mad as the mad hatter.
Of course these are suspicions rather than a theology. Belief always gets in the way..
By Bruce Duensing, at Sunday, September 04, 2011
BTW..In the NICAP summary, "Stephens and Gray described their UFO at first as looking like a helicopter, again like the Loring and Brunswick reports." It was alternatively described as having no visible means of propulsion as well. Presumably, one phenomenon having several physical forms or is it perception in physiology as influenced by the phenomenon itself may create red herrings which are consequently thought to be physical objects. In dualism this would suggest there is no phenomenon, but there is, although energetic and rare, it does exist. However, mistaking effects of the phenomenon for the nature of the phenomenon leads most astray into strange theologies based on belief alone.
And, again, here's the link - UFOcus
================================
Finally, BS is up to it again - a `UFO' video which defies categorization - Strange Red Light And Sound In Sky - yes, even different `light' and `sound' than `usual' for the anomalous. Or, is this nothing more than a hoax or elaborate Lazar display from someone just before July 4th?
=================================
Thanks for your visit today - Why Not Explore More Content In The Sidebar Before You Leave?
=================================
=================================
Things That Shouldn't Be There: Cougar, Bigfoot, and Other Anomalous Critters and Things That Should Not Be In the Northeast but Might Be
The thing that I find fascinating about the sounds is that they are all different. Why don't they relate in general? Why do some sounds seem like vibrations and some seem like roaring? Makes no sense. Could it be that the sounds that are like vibrations create a tuning fork effect, this might account for the difference in sounds heard in various locations. Each object ie, building, etc. might be "playing" a tune. That still doesn't explain roaring. This brings me to the question of ufo shapes. Why are they always different? Except for orbs. One ufo shape being seen and one sound being heard would be more convincing. It really seems like we are supposed to be confused by it all.
ReplyDelete