ANALYSIS OF CITIZEN UFO REPORTS & ANALYSIS OF UFOLOGY COVERAGE BY THE MEDIA
This Is - The HOME Page - What Lurks Within? Oh, BTW,`UFO Disclosure'? Bottom Of Page!
▼
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
Nearing Countdown On Fulham's Moscow Prediction
If you remember Stanley Fulham's prediction about the gradual increase in UFO Displays by the aliens - the next one was/is due in Moscow by the end of Friday (but, with strange language could extend over the next 9 days too). Supposedly of a longer or more in your face nature than NYC's on Oct. 13th. And, because the late Mr. Fulham got his last prediction PERFECT - anything less in this case would not be acceptable if one is to be glued to what his supposed information is from the entities channelled via his questions. This was his statement:
Meanwhile, here's some Moscow 2011 UFO videos already on YouTube: Jan.3rd.
Here's a link to the SAME UFO posted by a different person and claiming to be a half hour later than the first above - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Y6wyTzXMM&feature=related
Here's something in the sky 1-1-11:
Caution is urged on this Holographic Fake Plane from 1-4-11:
UDCC will be tracking this - certainly, nothing above would qualify, yet. Indeed, while UDCC is NOT certain that the Moscow Pyramid was REAL last year - IF it was (and there are photos and video) it was spectacular -- IF this is to TOP that - we indeed may have real alien disclosure on our hands.
Ten days ain't long to wait.
I am every now and then checking this webcam:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.webviews.co.uk/network/camera/eastern-europe/russia/moscow/federation-tower-webcam.html
I hope the Russians post all their videos on YouTube. It would be great to see a massive display over Moscow.
Thanks Alexandre.
ReplyDelete> Mr. Fulham got his last prediction PERFECT
ReplyDeleteAre you kidding?
I'm also checking Moscow's skies from that webcam, and checking rt.com transmission for news too. Checking at the weather for the next couple of days it seems that it won't be the best possible clean sky until next wednesday.
ReplyDeleteAnyway.. I'm watching very closely, even at work :P if they appear in Moscow and then in London I think this will be the beginning of the most important moment in history of mankind.. and the stupid people that says everytime that this events are BALLOONS or PLANES or whatever joke they can imagine, will realize that they're indeed the joke, and the goverment's puppets, thinking just how they want them to think.
I WANT TO BELIEVE!
Terry,
ReplyDeleteI've detailed in other posts how the Fulham prediction was NOT perfect - the Date - indeed he got right. And, since we await an event by a certain DATE - if not - his `prediction' may be nothing more than a blind squirrel finding a nut. That said, I do like his `reasoning' as to why the aliens are here.
Gadrian,
For the sake of Fulham's legacy it has to happen and happen in a very narrow timeframe. IF indeed he had some sort of exclusive access to this information via channeling, even that is HUGE news (why would they choose THIS guy)indeed.
IF there is a significant event in Moscow however, in the next two days - I'd have to say the ODDS ARE that INDEED something HUGE is up.
A miss on the date however - does move my opinion close to square one once again.
thanks for commenting,
Rick
aYou're right. Indeed, just the fact that they'd communicate with Stanley would raise thousands of questions.
ReplyDeleteThere's a little detail that doesn't make sense to me though. Specifically this quote:
There will be a major UFO display over Moscow between the end of the first part of January 2011 and the second week of January 2011.
Why "between the end of first part of january 2011 and the second week of january 2011" and not "between the first week and the second week of january 2011"? I don't speak english well, and I don't know if that's an exact translation from the real conversation (if it really ocurred, of course), but that quote doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
What is "the end of the first part of january 2011"? the end of the second week? then the range of "dates" would be "the end of the second week and the second week", doesn't it? or maybe it's just a typo. But.. I see that "typo" in a lot of sites, even in the Stanley's site itself.
I don't know, that quote sounds a little weird to me. What do you think?